Editorial standards
Information with
clear boundaries.
The purpose of our guides
Our articles are designed to help property owners and heirs understand terminology, organize questions, and prepare for professional conversations. They do not provide personalized legal, tax, investment, or financial advice.
Sources and jurisdiction
Our standard calls for primary sources where possible, including courts, government agencies, and relevant professional organizations. Articles should distinguish general information from jurisdiction-specific rules, and link to sources supporting substantive claims.
AI-assisted drafting and review
We may use automated tools to help research, outline, draft, and illustrate articles. Generated material must be reviewed before publication. Formatting checks and source links do not by themselves prove that an article is accurate, current, or complete.
Authorship and expertise
Bylines should identify the actual author or responsible editorial organization. We do not label an article as reviewed by a lawyer, accountant, or other specialist unless that review occurred and can be substantiated. Illustrative images are not evidence of client results.
Corrections and updates
Contact EstateUnlock with the article title, the passage in question, and a supporting source to report a possible error. A material correction should be explained, and update dates should reflect meaningful review rather than an automatic date change.
Commercial context
EstateUnlock provides property-related services. A consultation invitation should be distinguishable from educational information. Sponsored placements or affiliate relationships, if introduced, should be disclosed where they appear.
Older articles
Existing articles should be checked against this standard before being used in a paid campaign or represented as professionally reviewed. A publication date alone is not proof of current accuracy.
Contact EstateUnlock →